Documents
in Quebec History
Last
revised: 23 August 2000 | Les
Québécois, le clergé catholique et l'affaire des écoles du Manitoba / Quebecers,
the Catholic Clergy and the Manitoba School Question, 1890-1916
Letter
of Laurier to Gustave Drolet [Note
from the editor: The purpose of this letter by Laurier was to inform Drolet
of Canadian reactions to the Laurier-Greenway compromise. It also tells of Laurier's
feelings about the comments made in Rome to the authorities about him. At the
time when Drolet was on his mission no less than four bishops had been, or were
present, in Rome to put forward the clerical interpretation of the events that
had taken place in Canada (these were Archbishop Langevin of St. Boniface, Mgr.
Bégin, Archbishop of Quebec, Mgr. Gravel, Bishop of Nicolet and Mgr. Labrecque,
Bishop of Chicoutimi). Someone had spread the view that he was not a principled
Christian, was a Liberal of the sort condemned by pope Pius IX, had unspeakable
habits and was a Free Mason; this last accusation, given where it was made, was
probably the worse. The affirmation
of faith by Laurier is of interest and his belief in Catholicism cannot be denied.
However, one should not be naïve about this document. Apparently, Drolet showed
the letter to all comers, and it is probable that Laurier expected that. It is
thus possible that the sentiments expressed in it may not have been as genuine
and sincere as they appear. Certainly, they served Laurier well as one cleric
in Rome was reported to have said, upon being shown the letter of Laurier : "Why,
your Mr. Laurier is the only Christian in Canada!".] Ottawa,
15 December, 1896. [. . .] The settlement
which we have obtained from the government of Manitoba satisfies every sensible
man in Canada, but the clergy of the province of Quebec will not pardon us for
what it calls their check of last summer. They want revenge at all costs, and
unless the Holy See intervenes in time, we are threatened with a religious war
whose consequences alarm me. But we cannot draw back. Certain members of the clergy
are blind: if their way of thinking is to prevail, not only will we have a war
of religion, but thousands upon thousands of good Catholics will be brought to
hold religion responsible for the faults and excesses of its ministers. That must
be avoided at all costs [. . .] . I have
read with regret the remarks which Mgr. N. made about me, in the Vatican itself.
I am astonished, even though I have come to expect all manner of attacks. However,
I would never have believed there was so much malice in the heart of a certain
set. My dear Drolet, you have known me for well on to forty years; you know that
I have never paraded my religious convictions, but that they exist; I can appreciate
to-day how much influence they have over me, when I say that they have not been
shaken by the attacks of those whose mission it is to preach Christian charity. Whatever
comes. « II faut marcher droit son chemin. » That was your old Pontifical Zouave
motto; it is mine to-day. We must keep the straight road. I see clearly and distinctly
the goal. I do not know whether we can reach it, but I am full of hope and courage. It
is a singular thing, that these violent acts, this ignorance of conditions in
our own country, this war to which we are going to be exposed, far from estranging
me from the Church, draws me closer to it. I feel how superior religion is to
all that often is done in the name of religion. WILFRID
LAURIER Source : Oscar Douglas Skelton,
Life and Letters of Wilfrid Laurier. Vol. 2, Toronto, Oxford University
Press, 1921, 576p., p. 36. ©
2000 Claude Bélanger, Marianopolis College |