Canada, French
Canadians and Franco-Americans in the Civil War Era (1861-1865)
Preface
Introduction
Chapter I
Chapter II
Chapter III
Conclusion
Notes
Bibliographical Note
Last modified:
2001-08-13
|
Chapter Two
Factors
Motivating Franco-American Enlistments and Life in the Union Forces
Why
did thousands of French Canadians fight and die in a war that,
for the most part, did not concern them? This question, like its
answer, is universal. Indeed, the reasons that motivate young
men to fight in foreign conflicts are always the same, and can
be divided into four distinct categories: idealism, adventure,
profit or coercion.
Today
many people portray the Civil War as a conflict of ideals. Indeed,
idealism embraced two clear-cut objectives during the war: the
preservation of the Union and the liberation of the slaves. Slavery,
which was unsuited to Canadian agriculture in any case, first
fell into disuse, as Courts refused to be involved in the pursuit
of fugitives, and was officially abolished in the British Empire
in 1833. As a result, there was a strong abolitionist sentiment
in French Canada by the mid nineteenth-century. For example, Harriet
Beecher Stowe’s (1811-1896) celebrated 1852 novel, Uncle Tom’s
Cabin, was quickly translated into French and published in
1853 in Montreal under the title La case du père Tom,
ou, Vie des nègres aux États-Unis. It enjoyed
a wide circulation in French Canada. Louis-Antoine Dessaulles
(1819-1895), a prominent annexationist and radical, felt that
the Civil War had been caused by slavery, a system that was "the
practical negation of Republican institutions." Given these
views, some idealistic young men, like Henri Césaire Saint-Pierre
(1844-1916), who later became a judge and jurist in the Superior
Court of Montreal, seem to have enlisted out of a desire to put
down slavery. Saint-Pierre served in the Seventy-sixth New York
Regiment and was active in the G.A.R. after the war. He felt that
he and his comrades:
[…] were Christian
soldiers fighting for a holy cause and like the crusaders of
old, who wielded their violent swords in their efforts to free
their enslaved brethren moaning under the foot of a ruthless
conqueror; we devoted all our courage, summed all our energy
in the task of breaking to pieces the shackles by which three
millions of human beings were kept in bondage.
Other
French Canadians who were born in the United States or had resided
there for a good deal of time, may have enlisted out of patriotism
and a desire to preserve the Union. In French Canada, where some
radical Republicans were proponents of Canada’s annexation to
the United States, a few men may have fought to save a nation
that they considered a model of democracy and freedom. Indeed,
Saint-Pierre claimed to have enlisted not only to liberate the
slaves but also help preserve "the birth place of democracy":
We fought
also for the preservation of that sacred compact by which the
founders of the Republic had pledged [themselves] to the maintenance
of a government of the people, by the people and for the people.1
Certainly,
French Canadians were not above serving in foreign conflicts if
they felt that the cause was just. In the mid 1860s, several had
gone to Mexico to join the French forces defending the Catholic
empire of Maximilian. A few years later, over five hundred ardent
Catholics went overseas to defend Pope Pius IX against Italian
unification. In 1890, a few even volunteered to join a proposed
French military expedition to help suppress slavery in Africa.
However, it is unlikely that idealism was the primary motivating
factor behind most French Canadian or Acadian enlistments in the
Civil War. Indeed, while most French Canadians were sympathetic
towards abolition, they were also somewhat pro-Southern in their
outlook. Paradoxically, the conservative and Catholic press in
French Canada proclaimed itself in favor of secession but opposed
to slavery. Conservative elements within French Canada claimed
that the Civil War was the logical consequence of egalitarianism,
democracy and Republicanism. Any government founded on the principle
of popular sovereignty was destined to collapse in a fiery holocaust.
Overall, the Civil War seemed a vindication of the traditional
anti-Americanism of French Canada’s conservative and clerical
elite. Moreover, as a minority, French Canada did feel a degree
of sympathy for the South’s desperate struggle to maintain its
distinct identity. Some, like abbé Beaudry, saw God’s vengeful
hand at the root of the conflict. The United States was a society
built on "lies, corruption, blasphemy, immorality, fraud
and impiety" and was being punished for its sins. He reminded
his flock that "religion is the only solid base for a political
system." American political institutions were an insult to
God’s will because they were too democratic and egalitarian. Consequently,
Americans suffered from a general lack of respect for authority,
especially religious authority. Beaudry warned that the thousands
of French Canadians who had already died in the Civil War might
be a prelude to God’s wrath being unleashed on Canada. As in the
United States, war would be the punishment for Canada’s sins.2
Beaudry
was not the only Canadian to see war coming to Canada. Indeed,
the anti-Northern stance adopted by most Canadians was largely
a result of the North’s belligerent attitude towards the British
Empire. Fearing that a victorious North would turn on British
North America after defeating the Confederacy, many Canadians
hoped for a Southern victory. Others felt that American expansionism
and manifest destiny, always a threat to Canada, would be checked
by a permanently severed Union.
Following
the Trent affair of 1861, panic swept through British North America
as the possibility of an Anglo-American war where Canada would
be the battleground became very real. After an all-time high in
the late 1850s, Canadian-American relations now had reached a
fifty-year low. Indeed, the Civil War would poison relations between
Canada and her neighbor for several years and leave a legacy of
fear and mistrust north of the border.3
As the Confederacy tried in vain to draw Britain and France into
the conflict, the British army rushed thousands of reinforcements
into British North America to fend off an apprehended American
invasion force. The American Secretary of State, William H. Seward
(1801-1872), was a notorious proponent of annexation, and hostile
rumblings were heard throughout Washington as the urge to retaliate
against Canada to punish Great Britain gained momentum. At the
conclusion of hostilities, Seward was among those who felt that
a foreign war would be the quickest way to unite the North and
South. In the House of Representatives, abolitionist Owen Lovejoy
(1811-1864) of Illinois, who was close to Lincoln, threatened
that when the war was over the United States would aid the Irish
rebels, and foment a revolt in French Canada. Indeed, toward the
end of the war many Americans did fund and support the Fenian
Brotherhood. The Fenians were American-based Irish nationalists
who sought to harass the British by launching periodic raids or
"invasions" into British North America. Poorly planned
and badly led, the Fenian raids were easily repelled by the Canadian
Militia. Nonetheless, the unofficial American support of Fenianism
was a direct consequence of the diplomatic friction generated
by the Civil War. Many members of the Fenian "army"
were veterans of the Union army and their goals, as expressed
in one of their marching songs, were both belligerent and pathetic:
We
are the Fenian Brotherhood, skilled in the art of war,
And
we’re going to fight for Ireland, the land that we adore.
Many
battles we have won along with the boys in blue,
And
we’ll go and capture Canada, for we’ve nothing else to do.
Rumors
began to fly and exacerbated the situation. The most widely circulated
rumor claimed that the North, realizing that it could not conquer
the South, was ready to take Canada as a replacement. In diplomatic
circles, it was rumored that General Winfield Scott had been empowered
to offer French Canada to France if she would support the United
States in a war with the British Empire. Throughout the Union,
troops could be heard singing a new version of Yankee Doodle:
Secession
first he would put down
Wholly
and forever,
And
afterwards from Britain’s crown
He
Canada would sever.
Canadians
serving in the Union forces began to fear that they would soon
be ordered to invade their own country. A group of Canadian-born
soldiers went so far as to petition Lincoln not to declare war
on Great Britain.4
In
Canada, the militia was strengthened. In 1862, Canadian Premier
John A. Macdonald (1815-1891) introduced a bill in the Legislative
Assembly of the Province of Canada to establish an active militia
force of 50,000, to be selected by conscription if necessary.
The bill’s defeat brought about the fall of the government but
subsequent bills would shore up the defense of Canada. Meanwhile,
the British government moved to prohibit the export of military
material to the United States while the bishops of Canada East
(Quebec) launched a preparedness campaign. They urged all Catholic
men to join the Canadian Militia and prepare to defend their patrie
(country) against invasion. In December 1861, during the height
of the Trent affair, the Bishop of Montreal, Msgr. Bourget, called
on all the priests of his diocese to remind their parishioners
of the bravery of the French Canadian heroes of the battle of
Châteauguay, who had defeated a large American invasion
force in 1813.
War
fever gripped Canada. When rumblings were heard in the halls of
Congress or in the popular press in favor of annexation, it became
hard for Canadians to sympathize with a cause that, while just,
was also a threat to Canada. Moreover, both French and English
Canadians were disappointed when, early in the war, Lincoln failed
to identify abolition as one of his war goals. Canadian hostility
to the North reached its zenith in 1861-1862, then subsided somewhat
after the Emancipation Proclamation. In fact, Canadian opinion
evolved during different stages of the war. Lincoln’s assassination
did unleash a torrent of sympathy in Canada. On the whole, because
of Union belligerence towards Canada and the rest of the British
Empire, Canadian opinion was more anti-northern than pro-southern
per se.5
Remarkably,
fear and hostility towards the North did not stop thousands of
French Canadians from crossing the border and enlisting. Indeed,
many enlisted out of a sense of adventure or for money. Undeniably,
the call to arms coupled with the allure of uniforms, of action
and of far away places has always had a great effect on young
men. Contemporary accounts place a great deal of importance on
adventure as a motivation for enlistment. At the time, many believed
that French Canadian youths suffered from a particularly adventurous
spirit that they had inherited from the days of the fur trade.
In the annual report of the Province of Canada’s Ministry of Agriculture
to the Governor General, the commissioner of public works and
future father of Confederation, Jean-Charles Chapais (1811-1885),
agreed:
Who
cannot call to mind the voyageurs des pays d’en-haut, and
remember that these bands of gay and intrepid adventurers were
recruited almost entirely from the French Canadian youth? This
inclination of our ancestors still exists as strongly among their
children, and contributes in no small degree to draw away from
agricultural pursuits numbers of our young men, who, strong and
robust, might do important service in opening up the country.
How many hundreds of these are this day to be found at the mines
of California and Australia, engaged in the pursuit of treasures,
often in vain, and which, when they do find, they expend in useless,
often indeed in criminal extravagances? How many of them pass
their winters in the shanties, in the bosom of the forests, or
their summers at the fisheries on the north shore of the St. Lawrence,
or on the coast of Labrador and Gaspesia? Has not this same passion
for excitement the effect of seducing too great a number of our
young men into the ranks of the armies of the American Republic?6
A
prime example of an adventure-driven enlistment can be found in
French Canadian journalist and writer Rémi Tremblay (1847-1926).
At the age of twelve, Tremblay’s family left Quebec to immigrate
to Rhode Island, where he and several relatives worked in various
cotton mills in and around Woonsocket. However, when the Civil
War disrupted New England’s cotton industry, wages were cut and
the Tremblays were unable to find work. In 1862, the family returned
to Canada. At sixteen, Rémi Tremblay dreamed of serving
in the French Foreign Legion. He then figured that his best chance
to see any action was in the Union forces. Tremblay had caught
"war fever" at fourteen while living in Woonsocket.
In his autobiographical Civil War novel, Un revenant. Épisode
de la Guerre de Sécession (1884), he explains how it
affected him:
[I] had witnessed
the departure of the Woonsocket, R. I., company and was also
present for the ovation they received upon their return [from
the first battle of Bull Run]. The spectacle of those brave
men, their faces tanned by the Virginia sun, had gripped [my]
imagination. The few injured men [I] had seen with their arm
in a splint or walking with crutches inspired [me]. [I] believed
that those soldiers who had lost their lives at Bull Run were
martyrs to the cause of humanity. The dead, the injured and
the survivors all seemed to be heroes. [I] would have enlisted
immediately, but it was 1861 and [I] was only fourteen.7
In
October 1863, penniless, the sixteen-year old Tremblay left his
job and his family and walked 72 miles from Contrecoeur, Quebec,
to Rouse’s Point, New York, where he enlisted in the Fourteenth
United States Regular Infantry. He had signed up "not for
money but for glory." However, during his eighteen months
of service, Tremblay would see very little money or glory, and
plenty of misery. He saw action in the battles of the Wilderness,
Spotsylvania, Cold Harbor and in the siege of Petersburg and fought
bushwhackers in Kentucky and West Virginia. Captured in 1864,
he was incarcerated for six long months in the notorious Libby
Prison in Richmond, Virginia. Paroled, Tremblay was sent to a
parole camp in Annapolis, Maryland, where he went absent without
leave and deserted. Wanted for desertion, he quickly returned
to Canada and in 1866 became an officer in the Canadian Militia.
He then saw action during the Fenian raids. Later he became a
journalist and a translator at the Canadian House of Commons.
An adventurous man throughout his life, Tremblay died in Pointe-à-Pitre,
Guadeloupe, in the French West Indies. He was not the only French
Canadian to use his Civil War experience to secure a commission
in the Canadian Militia. Though he should have been arrested upon
his return to Canada for flouting the British Foreign Enlistment
Act, Isaïe Dussault (1843-1929), who had joined the Union
army in 1864, went on to become a lieutenant-colonel in the Canadian
Régiment de Portneuf.
Tremblay,
like many other French Canadian soldiers, did not have any scruples
regarding desertion, and indeed, tried to desert several times.
After reading that Confederate President Jefferson Davis had issued
a proclamation granting an amnesty and promising to repatriate
foreign-born Union soldiers, Tremblay claims to have deserted
to a band of West Virginian bushwhackers in hopes of being allowed
to travel to Mexico and enlist in Emperor Maximilian’s army. When
he learned that he would not be sent anywhere but back to the
Union lines, Tremblay eventually found his way back to his regiment,
so as to avoid a court martial.
Many
young French Canadians, upon learning that army life was not as
glamorous as it had first seemed, deserted. Some tried to obtain
a release on the grounds that they were British subjects and that
their enlistment violated British neutrality laws or that they
had enlisted while underage and without parental consent.
About forty percent of the Union forces were twenty-one years
old or less and many were younger than eighteen. Éphrem-A.
Brisebois (1850-1890) enlisted in 1865, when he was only fifteen.
A fervent Catholic, he later served in the Papal Zouaves and fought
Italian unification. In 1873, when the Canadian government set
up the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to patrol the recently acquired
North-West Territories, Brisebois was named one of its nine commanding
officers. During 1875, he supervised the construction of Fort
Brisebois, which was later renamed Calgary, Alberta. In 1885,
Brisebois took part in the suppression of Louis Riel’s North-West
Rebellion.
Undeniably,
the Civil War was hell. Indeed, many Franco-Americans would never
return home. Onésime Falardeau (1828-1862) was the first
soldier from Cohoes, N. Y. to be killed in the war when the train
that should have brought him to his basic training camp struck
him. Eusèbe Sansouci (or San Souci) had settled in the
United States in 1855. After enlisting in the First United States
Cavalry Regiment, he was killed in the battle of Salem Church,
Virginia, in 1863. One of his children, Emery John (1857-1936),
would go on to become the Republican Lieutenant Governor (1915-1920)
and Governor (1921-1923) of Rhode Island. Some French Canadians
would return home horribly maimed.
Discipline
in the army was often severe and the pay was low and irregular.
The terror of battle contrasted severely with the monotony and
boredom of camp life, with its endless and tedious drills and
reviews as well as dirty, leaky and cold tents. Long marches carrying
forty pounds of equipment, food shortages, contaminated water,
parasites, improper nutrition, sanitation, lodging and medical
care all weakened the troops’ health and morale. Wearing the same
uniform year-round, troops baked in the summer and froze in the
winter. While the Union soldier was better fed than his Confederate
counterpart, on the whole, his diet was utterly deficient. He
lacked fresh meat, fruits and vegetables. Improper treatment of
the wounded and the sick made soldiers fear the doctor. In fact,
disease claimed twice as many Civil War soldiers than combat.
In an era where germs were unknown to medical science, measles,
especially in winter, malaria, venereal disease, dysentery and
the deadly typhoid fever were the soldier’s worst enemies. The
camps surrounding Washington, D. C., which were transit points
during the war, were notoriously insalubrious during the first
phase of the conflict. Charles Bilodeau (1834-1901) of Saint-Lazare,
Quebec, immigrated to Pennsylvania in the 1850s and enlisted as
a cook in late 1861. He offers a good example of how disease spread
through the Union ranks. In his diary, he recounts his brush with
death near Washington in 1861: "November 16. After having
slept on the ground and in the mud, without any blanket, I contracted
typhus." Bilodeau was lucky to survive, though he would later
contract both dysentery and malaria. No longer a cook, he saw
action until mid-1865 and was able return home to Saint-Lazare
after the war.8
Like
Rémi Tremblay, many Franco-American soldiers had to suffer
through the wretched and unsanitary conditions of Confederate
prison camps. Malnourished in cramped and insalubrious camps,
many would not survive their internment. Simon M. Dufur (Dufour)
of Richford, Vermont, was confined for eleven long months in Pemberton,
Libby, Belle Island, Florence, and the notorious Andersonville
Prison. A private in Company B of the 1st Regiment
of Vermont Cavalry, Dufur was captured at the age of nineteen
during the Kilpatrick-Dahlgren raid on Richmond, Virginia. He
later wrote a gripping account of his incarceration under the
title of Over the Dead Line (1902).
Modern
warfare is said to be largely impersonal. Ships and planes fire
missiles at distant targets and inflict "collateral damage."
Inversely, Civil War fighting was highly personal. Soldiers would
fire at each other at close range and then charge with fixed bayonets.
Battles often degenerated into vicious hand-to-hand combat, which,
at heart, was not fundamentally different from the methods of
war practiced two thousand years ago. The deadly chaos of battle,
where the screams of the wounded and the dying mingled with the
smoke and noise of rifle and cannon fire drove many men mad. Forced
to kill or be killed, many Franco-American soldiers returned home
psychologically scarred by their war experiences.9
Isolated
and homesick, Franco-American soldiers might not even be able
to turn to their chaplain, who was usually a Protestant, and if
he was Catholic, could probably not speak French. It was virtually
impossible for isolated Catholics to keep Lent. Moral degradation
rolled through the camps and Catholics and Protestants alike were
swept up in a wave of swearing, gambling, drinking and prostitution.
The accent and religion of foreign-born soldiers often made them
the victims of pranks, mischief and abuse. Though French Canadians
who had worked in lumber camps were used to cramped quarters,
exhausting work and bad food, often, a steady diet of salt pork,
hard tack and coffee and the general harshness of military life
would take its toll on even the most hardened recruit. Many would
do almost anything to get out of the service. Canada’s National
Archives contain one particularly pitiful yet touching letter
written in desperation by a young English Canadian who had endured
the Peninsular campaign of 1862:
You may write
to Lord Lyons [the British Minister in Washington] & try
to get me out if you can […] I want to get out very bad tell
him that I enlisted under eighteen & that I am only five
months over it now. Tell him that I am a British subject […]
We got half a lemon and four potatoes one day and that was all
[…] the food didn’t come […] we are full of lice […] the bones
stick out all over me […] I saw the Rebels on the other side
of the river [while] on picket but I did not fire at them. It
seemed too much like murder & I thought of the Golden Rule
– do unto others as you would they should do unto you […]10
Of
course, the war could have its lighter side. In a letter to his
parents, a Wisconsin private recounted a story that probably involved
a French Canadian:
We came in
the [railway] cars from Madison from La Crosse. It was a new
experience for me, I was wide awake the whole day. I was afraid
we were off the track every time we crossed a switch or came
to a river. At the towns the girls swarmed on the platforms
to ask the boys for their pictures and to kiss the best looking
ones. A young Frenchman […] small and quick, got the most kisses.
He was so short the boys held him by the legs so he could reach
down out the windows to kiss the girls. Many times some old
fellows held the girls up so she could be reached. It was fun
anyway.11
Most
French Canadians did find the adventure they craved. Some thoroughly
enjoyed the camaraderie of military life. Others served in the
Deep South and returned home with exotic stories involving Negroes
or alligators to tell their enthralled relatives. Many rural men
who had never even seen a camera before had their first picture
taken. Though French Canadian soldiers were often picked on by
their Anglo-American peers, many claimed to have been quite popular,
as they were able to entertain their comrades by telling stories
of Indians and far away places or by singing French songs. Rémi
Tremblay claims to have been particularly well liked by his comrades.
His ability to "imitate Irish, Negro or German accents"
or to "sing bawdy songs" apparently endeared him to
his brothers in arms. In his memoirs he wrote that: "There
was no animosity directed at French Canadians. They [his comrades]
only knew of one, [myself], whom they called Frenchy."
Then, as today, many Franco-Americans had to endure being known
as "Frenchy" at some moment of their life.12
The
presence of musicians or of a band in a regiment might raise the
troops’ morale. One of the distinguishing characteristics of the
Union army was its numerous bands of musicians. When not on the
march, bands commonly gave concerts that were greatly enjoyed
by the soldiers. Indeed, before gramophones, radio or television
came into existence, live music was one of the preferred entertainment
of the masses. On the whole, Civil War soldiers had to provide
their own entertainment. During the early part of the war, each
regiment was authorized a band, but in mid-1862 an order was passed
prohibiting bands below the brigade level. In September 1861,
one of Canada’s most famous composers, Calixa Lavallée
(1842-1891) enlisted as a first-class trumpeter in the Fourth
Rhode Island Regiment, probably under the name Caliax Levalley.
Born near Verchères, Quebec, Lavallée had run away
from home at the age of fifteen and had eventually joined a traveling
minstrel show at New Orleans. A musician at heart, he nonetheless
found himself transferred to combat duty after the War Department
suppressed regimental bands. Wounded in the leg during the battle
of Antietam, he was honorably discharged in October 1862. After
his discharge, Lavallée would compose the music to O
Canada, which today is Canada’s national anthem. He died in
Boston at the age of forty-nine. Some historians speculate that
Lavallée’s interest in patriotic music was sparked by his
days as a military musician.13
Though
there was no specifically Canadian unit in the way there were
Irish or German regiments during the war, many French Canadians
served in regiments from Northern New England, the Midwest or
upstate New York where their countrymen were well represented.
Several regiments from Maine or Vermont contained so many French
Canadians that French became the dominant language within some
companies. Some served in the only French regiment of the Union
army, the Gardes Lafayette (the Fifty-fifth New York), commanded
by a French immigrant, the writer and journalist Colonel Régis
de Trobriand (1816-1897), who had had previous military training
and experience in France. The regiment had been formed out of
a New York militia unit and was partially equipped with funds
collected among the French and French Canadian population of New
York city. They drilled at Camp Lafayette on Staten Island before
being shipped to the front. After a year of service, the regiment
had lost over four hundred men and had to be incorporated into
the Thirty-eighth New York Regiment.14
A
few attempts were made to form Canadian or French Canadian regiments
in the Union army. All failed. In 1861, Colonel Rankin, who was
a member of Parliament in the Province of Canada and a militia
officer, set out to raise a regiment of sixteen hundred lancers
for service with the North. He was quickly arrested for violating
the British Foreign Enlistment Act. As a Union recruitment officer,
Edmond Mallet had sought unsuccessfully to regroup all the French
Canadians serving in the various infantry units mustered in the
Lake Champlain region into one French Canadian regiment. Major
Mallet, whose family emigrated from Montreal to Oswego, New York,
when he was only seven, would eventually become a prominent member
of the Franco-American elite. After the battle of Fair Oaks in
1862, Mallet was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant. Severely
wounded at the battle of Cold Harbor in 1864, he had been left
for dead on the battlefield (his death was even announced in an
Oswego newspaper) when a general who knew him well insisted that
he receive medical treatment. After the battle, he recovered and
was cited for "distinguished gallantry" and promoted
from the rank of lieutenant to that of major by President Lincoln.
After the war, Mallet attended Columbia University and received
a degree in law. He went on to work for the United States Treasury
Department and was named Special Indian Agent in Oregon by President
Grant in 1874. Later, President Cleveland named him Inspector-General
of Indian Affairs. Sadly, after his years of military and civil
service, Mallet, like many other Franco-Americans, could barely
speak French and was only a nominal Catholic. However, after a
visit to Canada awakened his faith and his national pride, Mallet
became very active in the movement to preserve the French language
and culture in the United States. He acknowledged that he had
been saved at Cold Harbor by Providence and by his mother’s prayers
and became a zealous Catholic. As an amateur historian and bibliophile,
Mallet sought to chronicle the contribution of French Canadians
to the American Republic in an effort to instill a sense of pride
among his compatriots. Today, his library forms the core of the
Union Saint-Jean-Baptiste d’Amérique’s collection of Franco-Americana.
Major Mallet had risen through the ranks to become, it would seem,
the highest ranked French Canadian in the Union forces. According
to Colonel de Forest, "if he had been five years older and
five inches taller, he would have finished the war a general rather
than a major." On the whole, French Canadians in the Union
army were disadvantaged not so much by their height or age but
by their language and religion and by their general lack of military
experience. Indeed, for various reasons, French Canadians were
under-represented in the ranks of the Canadian Militia. Consequently,
most French-speaking officers in the Union army were from France
and had previous military experience. While there was
one Montreal-born general in the Union army, Jacob Dolson Cox,
and one Canadian-born colonel, Joseph R. Scott, few French Canadians
received officer’s commissions.15
Along
with adventure, money seems to have been the other prime motivation
for French Canadians to enlist in the Union army. By 1863, recruitment
had reached an impasse in the United States. Americans who were
going to enlist for various reasons already had. The economy was
in high gear and America had become war weary. An inefficient
and unfair draft system (only seven percent of the men whose names
were drawn actually served) allowed the purchasing of substitutes
or an exemption from military service with the payment a 300 dollar
commutation fee. Viewed as a right, substitution had a long tradition
in America. However, the draft system was mostly an inducement
to volunteer. Indeed, it was the volunteer who truly stood to
profit from the war. As the conflict progressed and states and
counties sought to fill their enlistment and draft quotas, the
value of national, regional and local bounties increased. A substitute
might receive several hundred dollars for his services, especially
after Congress repealed commutation in 1864. By the end of the
conflict, an entrepreneurial recruit could also combine federal,
state, county and municipal bounties into grants of a thousand
dollars or more.16
In
French Canada, as elsewhere, this sum represented a small fortune.
Most Canadian workers only earned a few dollars a week and most
farms, if they produced a marketable surplus, could not expect
their yearly profits to exceed one or two hundred dollars. Many
enlisted in late 1864 or early 1865, knowing that the conflict
would soon be at a close and hoping to use their bounty money
to pay off debts or buy a farm. In a predictable pattern, poverty
and debt drew many French Canadians into the Union army. The Canadian
government understood the importance of Union bounties in attracting
foreign recruits. In 1864, the Report of the Canadian Minister
of Agriculture tried to explain the recent slump in immigration
to Canada by claiming that: "The high bounty offered for
enlistment in the North has also had a powerful effect in directing
the current of European emigration toward our neighbors’ shores."17
As
America became desperate for soldiers, substitute brokers and
unofficial recruitment officers crossed the border in hopes of
inducing Canadians to enlist. These men operated illegally. Indeed,
under the British Foreign Enlistment Act of 1818, it was illegal
for British subjects to serve or recruit for foreign armies. It
was also illegal for foreigners to recruit British subjects. Moreover,
American law also forbade foreign recruiting. Quickly rescinded
and rarely enforced, the War Department’s General Order No. 45
of July 1861 had even prohibited the acceptance into the service
of recruits who did not speak English. These legal stumbling blocks
did not stop substitute brokers and recruiters from operating
throughout Canada. Often these men sought to induce British soldiers
to desert from the low pay and harsh discipline of the British
army. They also convinced many privates and officers to desert
from the Canadian Militia. Receiving a bounty or commission for
every young man they could convince to cross the border, many
agents operated with complete impunity. Bribes and a need for
recruits made American officials look the other way. Detroit,
Buffalo and Northern New England became centers of Canadian recruitment.
Towards the end of the war, the problem became so serious that
the Canadian government had to set up a secret police force to
counter it.18
Some
of the most successful recruiters were Franco Americans. The French
Canadian elite denounced these men with particular vehemence.
In 1864, the Bishop of Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Msgr. Thomas
Cooke (1792-1870), warned the clergy of his diocese that it was
their duty to "unmask these traitors."19
However,
the system functioned improperly and many French Canadians took
advantage of its flaws. Indeed, Canadians were notorious "bounty
jumpers." Some were known to cross the border, enlist, claim
their bounties and then desert and return to Canada at the first
opportunity. A few even repeated this feat several times. Union
General H. B. Carrington reported that British North Americans
would enlist, desert and enlist again, and that to help put an
end to this practice he had court-martialed and executed two unfortunate
Canadians who had each collected three bounties.20
Canadians
were not the only people to abuse the system. As French Canadians
headed south to serve in the Union forces or work in a booming
economy, hundreds of northern soldiers deserted and took a "French
furlough" in Montreal. In early 1863, when Union morale hit
rock bottom, desertion and draft dodging reached a fever pitch
and were noticeably prevalent in the states that bordered Canada.
Indeed, Canada proved a safe heaven for deserters and draft dodgers
or "skeddadlers" as they were called. At first, these
men were welcomed because a decline in immigration from the British
Isles had created a labor shortage. However, Canada soon contained
as many as fifteen thousand deserters and draft dodgers. Coupled
with the Union spies, escaped POWs, Confederate agents and copperheads
that circulated freely in British North America, these men drove
wages down and created all kinds of disturbances.21
Not
all French Canadians were enlisted into the Union forces of their
own free will. During the Civil War, both sides used entrapment
and coercion to fill their ranks. Some French Canadians were illegally
drafted in the United States while others who had become American
citizens were subject to the draft. During the conflict, stories
abounded of "crimps" drawing Canadians over the border
with the promise of work and tricking or coercing them into enlisting.
These stories generally follow a predictable pattern: An American
would hire a French Canadian or promise him work across the border.
The French Canadian would cross the border and go out and get
drunk with his new friend (sometimes victims were drugged). The
next morning, he would awake hung over in a barracks dressed in
a blue uniform and discover that he had enlisted in the Union
army. Often, his freedom and his bounty had been taken away. Some
men were abducted from their homes along the American border,
while others were arrested while in the U.S. for alleged desertion
from an army to which they had never belonged and were forced
to enlist to avoid incarceration. The Collector of Customs at
Coaticook, Quebec, claimed that crimps made it unsafe for townsmen
to be out at night. Reports of mere boys being tricked into recruiting
were not uncommon. In 1864, six French Canadians petitioned the
Governor-General of British North America, Lord Monck (1819-1894),
on behalf of a sixteen-year-old named Alfred Broissoit who had
been made drunk by a recruiting officer, taken from Montreal to
the United States where he enlisted and then was fleeced of his
bounty money and forced to sign a receipt for a sum greatly in
excess of his bounty. In his short novel, L’Innocente victime
(1936), Franco-American writer and folklorist Adélard
Lambert (1867-1946) tapped into the multitude of French Canadian
folk-tales surrounding "crimping" and told the story
of a young man who was tricked into enlisting in 1864. Wounded
in battle and stricken with amnesia, the man fails to locate his
wife who sets out to find him and is murdered in a case of mistaken
identity. Lambert’s novel, along with Rémi Tremblay’s Un
revenant and a few poems, are the only evidence of the Civil
War to be found in French Canadian literature.22
While
crimping did exist, it was not as common as Civil War era accounts
suggest. Priests often used crimps as bogeymen to scare their
parishioners away from the United States and alcohol. The government
of the Province of Canada did all it could with limited resources
to stop crimping. Sometimes, it offered rewards to apprehend known
crimps.
It
would also appear that about one in fifty British North Americans
who fought in the Civil war served in the Confederate forces.
Very little is known about these men. Some Nova Scotians served
in the small Confederate navy or on blockade runners. Since only
a few Franco-Americans lived in the Southern States in 1860 their
numbers in the Confederate forces must have been very limited.
In his autobiographical novel, Rémi Tremblay claimed that
after deserting from the Union army he served briefly in a Confederate
unit to avoid being sent back to the Union lines to face a court
martial. After a few days, he deserted from his new unit and found
himself in the unenviable position of being wanted for desertion
by both sides. Isaïe Pigeon was living in Maryland in 1861
when he enlisted with a fellow French Canadian named Durocher
in the Confederate Langways Regiment. Born in 1841 in Coteau Landing,
Quebec, he took part in the first battle of Bull Run and was promoted
to the rank of lieutenant before being captured in 1863. After
his release he returned to live in Canada.23
In
French Canada, the clergy had long claimed that life in America
would be deadly and miserable for emigrants. During the Civil
War their words rang true. Indeed, the political and clerical
elite of French Canadian society did all it could to stop young
men from enlisting in the Union or Confederate forces. Though,
as was the case with French Canadian immigration to the United
States, they were less than successful in putting an end to enlistments.
While they were denounced in both the pulpit and in Parliament,
hardly any Canadian-born Union soldiers were arrested when they
returned home. A couple of French Canadian priests even found
themselves serving as chaplains in Union regiments or hospitals.
In addition, two French Canadian surgeons and five Canadian-born
nuns attended to the sick and wounded during the conflict.24
©
2001 Claude Bélanger, Marianopolis College |
|