Studies
on the Canadian Constitution and Canadian Federalism
Last
revised: 19 February 2001 | The
"Declaratory Power" in the Canadian Constitution
Claude
Bélanger, Department of History, Marianopolis College The
Parliament of Canada is empowered by virtue s. 91 (29) to enact legislation in
Relation to "Such Classes of Subjects as are expressly excepted in the Enumeration
of the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures
of the Provinces." A close examination of s. 92 reveals that the scope of
s.91(29) is limited to the exceptions listed in s.92 (1) (Lieutenant-Governor)
and s.92 ( 10 a, b, c). Under s. 92 (l0 c) the Parliament of Canada is empowered
to legislate on "Such works as, although wholly situated within the Province,
are before or after their Execution declared by the Parliament of Canada to be
for the general Advantage of Canada or for the Advantage of Two or more of the
provinces." Such is the declaratory power of the Parliament of Canada; to
a large extent, one could easily argue that the declaratory power enables Parliament
to reapportion the distribution of legislative power in the Constitution Act,
1867 as there are, really few limitations imposed on the exercise of that power
by Parliament. It alone is the judge as to whether or not a "work" is
of "a general advantage (to) Canada." The role of the courts is limited
to determining whether or not the Parliament of Canada is dealing with a "work"
in the sense used in s.92 (l0c). The
Fathers of Confederation said next to nothing about the exercise of this power.
One of the rare mentions of it was made by Macdonald (Confederation Debates,
p. 40). He gave as an example of the possible use of the declaratory power the
Welland Canal. This was not a particularly enlightening example as canals had
otherwise been declared to fall under federal jurisdiction in any case! Courts
have held the "works" have to be interpreted to mean something tangible,
a "thing" or an "integrated activity" that would be presumably
man-made since the clause contains the words "before and after their execution."
The courts have further held that the declaration has to be made by statutory
enactment and that such transfers of jurisdiction as are effected under s. 92
(l0c) are not necessarily permanent and that Parliament might repeal or modify
any declaration. Among others, local
railways, grain elevators, Bell telephone, flour mills, feed mills, feed warehouses,
seed cleaning mills, uranium exploration, atomic production, research and refining
establishments have all been declared to be "to the advantage of Canada"
and transferred under federal jurisdiction. Recently
there have been recommendations to limit the declaratory power of the Parliament
of Canada and to subject it to one form or another of provincial consent or judicial
review. Use of the Declaratory
power by periods (1867-1961)
| 1867-1873: | 25
| 1911-1921:
| 30 |
| 1873-1878: | 11 | 1921-1930: | 16 |
| 1878-1891: | 121
| 1930-1935: | 6 |
| 1891-1896: | 65 | 1935-1957: | 17 |
| 1896-1911: | 176 | 1957-1961: | 3 |
Total: 470 396
federal declarations (84,2%) dealt with railways and 116 affected Quebec (24,6%). ©
2001 Claude Bélanger, Marianopolis College |